The Bush Philosophy: Bad and Good Side

Every president has a political philosophy that guides him and, sometimes, the nation.

George W. Bush believes he has divine inspiration to do what he wants to do, when he wants to do it, and to make his subjects adhere to whatever beliefs he holds for the moment. His political philosophy is a chunk of swiss cheese that is being forced down the throats of a lactose-intolerant nation.

During his first campaign for the presidential office, he preached a doctrine against the building of the nation and strikes with preferred right of the military. Within a year of his inaugural he it already glided to export his version of the democracy to the world. In the term of two years, he had begun to rotate half-truth and lies in his plans to send a strike with preferred right against Iraq and to create a “change of the regime.” That “the plan of the building of the nation”, nevertheless, has proven as hard as a bridge constructed by the nonunion work that worked for a corrupt contractor.

Like the Commander-in-Chief, a title of that it is not vacillating to use in almost each occasion, he found it towards outside could as easily move billion ships military of the dollar as the boats of the toy and the duckies of rubber in its bathtub.

George W. Bush, in attacking Bill Clinton to put to troops in Bosnia, demanded the terms for the retirement. But, because the war that he created in Iraq, and that it seems quagmire that one became the war of Vietnam, he has decided that the terms were models for the lack, that “makes no sense say to the enemy when you glide to begin to retire.”

Like president, George W. Bush pushed boy of not to the left behind the act, that requires the extensive test of students to consider that it solves Republican-approved goals. Within months to create the program, they forced the professors “teach to the test,” rather that to improve the education of a student. Still, president Bush becomes infuriated when the critical suggest him has failed in each test of the success in Iraq, and that a nation used down by the cost of a failed foreign policy says challenging that is impossible to measure success in war.

When most of Americans he declared, in survey after survey, opposed the use of the torture, even against the workers of al-Qaeda, the Commander-in-Chief decided that he did not concern the majority.

It has neglected desires of the people who believe in a better medical care for all the Americans. Shortly after it took the office, president Bush retired the United States in the agreement of Kyoto, signed by 37 industrialized nations. Its answer was to gut the atmosphere and, against the results of an overwhelming majority of scientists, not only demanded that global warming up itself is not a problem, but it has suppressed to the opinions the scientists of the government.

In almost each speech of campaign, even those after they chose it, he pontificates on fiscal responsibility, the personal freedom, and less government in the lives of people. Its fiscal irresponsibility has lead to the cost of deficit and a national debt that our grandsons still will pay; he sent an extensive system of the spy against Americans, and thinks that legislation-Constitutionalist still more needs to be amendments, specific-to to burn himself of the flag of the interdiction (an edition the Supreme Court has already dealed with) and to the same union of sex.

When the republicans controlled congress, the president smirky demanded that the Senate adheres to for arrives-or-down the vote in all its majority of votes of the people assign-one was all the one that must be necessary to approve its candidates. Its belief, repeated by the chosen nation the republicans and googles of char it of preservative radio demonstrates to the hosts, opposite the whole history of the Senate that allows the discussion up to 60 or more senators vote to finish that discussion. President Bush invoked that “for he arrives-or-down” vote in the appointment of John Bolton, that had a long history from the opposition to the United Nations, to be the ambassador of the E.E.U.U to president Bush demanded “for arrives-or-down votes” of U.N in the Senate to approve to his candidates to the federal cuts, to ambassadorships, and the cabinet. It is democracy, he bleated. Majority of votes. Rules of the majority. By all means, he forgot that properly had he he believed truth in majority of votes, Al Gore would have been president.

Nevertheless, after the democrats took the control from the congress, the mountain range of president Bush the light and decided that that for arrives-or-down the votes did not matter. The lieutenants of the president blocked for arrives-or-down vote in the “big wave” in Iraq. When the house voted 247-176 and the Senate voted 63-37 to allow the federal financing for the investigation of the cell of piston rod, the president oh-so-moral decided that the majority and for arrives-or-down the votes did not matter, and that vetoed the propose legislation.